Journal article
Hydrologic shortcomings of conventional urban stormwater management and opportunities for reform
MJ Burns, TD Fletcher, CJ Walsh, AR Ladson, BE Hatt
Landscape and Urban Planning | Published : 2012
Abstract
Conventional approaches to stormwater management for environmental protection fail because they do not address all of the changes to the flow regime caused by conventional stormwater drainage. In this paper, we contrasted the hydrologic effects of two conventional approaches to urban stormwater management - (a) drainage-efficiency focused and (b) pollutant-load-reduction focused - identifying their shortcomings and contrasting their hydrologic outcomes with those of a proposed alternative approach focused on restoring important elements of the natural flow regime. Under conventional approaches, both high-flow and low-flow hydrology remain perturbed. We suggest that urban stormwater managemen..
View full abstractRelated Projects (2)
Grants
Awarded by Australian Research Council
Funding Acknowledgements
This work was supported by Melbourne Water and the Australian Research Council's Linkage Projects scheme (project number LP0883610) and TDF is supported by the Council's Future Fellowship scheme. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the funding bodies. The authors would like to thank Upula Maheepala from Melbourne Water for kindly providing streamflow data for Brushy and Olinda Creeks. The manuscript was greatly improved by the suggestions of three anonymous referees.